|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 57 post(s) |

Johan Civire
Dirty Curse inc.
182
|
Posted - 2012.11.07 18:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
I was thinking there are stop working on this wis project the still working on it ? ps no hating just want to now because iam a big fan of this project. |

Johan Civire
Dirty Curse inc.
183
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 01:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Johan Civire wrote:I was thinking there are stop working on this wis project the still working on it ? ps no hating just want to now because iam a big fan of this project. They stopped ,thats all
the problem pal i dont belive you al your post see your own history are hated and bashing the wis project so you lying atleast 90% of your post.
So move on troll and let real people answer my question! thanks and end of discusion about this. |

Johan Civire
Dirty Curse inc.
580
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 01:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
Its over there will be no wis project or any avatar game. The spend to long on this project and what do we get. A avatar thats stuck in a room with some basic tools that we already have. You can walk sure. But you can also spin your ship. Dont see the point to work on this. I was fan of the project but let us be real, is that what eve online realy needs? for the world of warcraft people yah the need it but for the x1,2,3 players we dont need it.
So do we realy want a startrek online in eve online? Realy? |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
635
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 03:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Doc Fury wrote:The same would also apply to most of the "giev WIS naow!!!" posts in this and other threads. Most of the data and etc used to further that position are presented matter-of-factly, but in reality turn out to be only emotionally fueled and pulled directly from a rectum. CCP is never going to release the number of people who still have CQ turned on because the entire WiS fiasco was a huge black stain on the game and on CCP's reputation. I still don't understand why this thread is open considering Team Avatar has been disbanded and the roleplayers and furries have their own ghetto forum where they can go and talk about dance parties.
I think you are out of trash talk and if you are "claiming" that WiS is stop i think you got more issues than trash talk. The have sayed that the will reveal more in 2014 about the WiS and even open the door. Now please stop talking with your trash talk. Keep hating dude keep hating this will give more people to argue with you than any other dude telling about the real stuff.
The only problem with WiS is that people like you are a dude from the past. Saying like my old dad and my granpa that the "old" days are better. But you forgot if we stick in the past we die. Progress my boy progress the WiS will give eve a new look and better story telling better interact then chatting and see only some text..... Its like when the first chat boxs get life back in 1987. Every one wants to chat back then. Now nobody do. Progress keep your anger for your self. Let the new down get bird i bett you will like it even when you hate it the first time.
The WiS will boost eve online. Not only the $ but also more people that perhaps will stay.
The only fiasco is you`re kind of people sticking in the past afread to change. Thats why we still living on planet earth in real life. Get over your self keep your cave man reaction to your self. /end of debate on this matter. |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
638
|
Posted - 2013.09.14 18:45:00 -
[5] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Tanthalassa wrote:People who keep screaming WiS as concept should die are practically demanding that CCP scrap all the work done in those "2 years that they ignored real Eve." I think this player base could be more supportive. They have already scrapped it and the game is healthier for it.
Like i say before i will see you on the press event 2014 o wait you don't go you have no f*cking clue what is happening you are just a hate dude. That want to get your will of proof. Its like believing,, you believe your own sh*t if you continue like this.
Some people are just haters afraid of change. God I want to see your face when to open that door in 2014. Just please make a youtube with hate and then the open the doors. Jesus I know you will get millions of views just to see your reaction in 2014.
next time waffle go to some press release next time to see what I mean. Yes I was there and yes I talk and yes the showed some off screen stuff. That's not find able on youtube. If I have proof no. Do I speak 100% true? that will be found out in 2014 do we!
And about the release of incarnia yes I was there the fact the where angry about is the had it coming not about the WiS project but about the fact the take age to do something and broke allot of promises do you even know what promises no you don't because you have no f*cking clue what I`m talking about. And the have mixs the sh*t up. So I proof again you`re wrong. Stop hating dude it will not help the fact is you want answers go talk not hating this will not get you any answers.
|

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
643
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 22:10:00 -
[6] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Varius Xeral wrote:http://users.telenet.be/mmodata/Charts/Subs-2.png
make of it what you will, but theres the data That graph illustrates perfectly why CCP should stay out of the WiS business. There's some additional analysis here: http://mmodata.blogspot.com/2013/08/version-40-thoughts-and-comments.htmlHere's the important part: Quote:Talking about EVE Online, that is still the example of how to do things in the post - WoW era. While CCP thought they were becoming the dinosaur of the industry, and therefore had to implement a cash shop with micro transactions. They realized their mistakes in time ( after their customers reminded them where their loyalty must lie Riots-in-eve-against-microtransactions ). And turned around and got back on track making EVE Online a better game.
CCP is being rewarded now, with a PCU ( peak concurrent users ) of over 65.000 and over 500.000 monthly playing subscribers and a continued growth every year since release, now more than 10 years ago.
At this moment EVE Online is the second biggest subscription based MMORPG in the west, and the only subscription based MMORPG that is still growing in the west and probably in the world.
I have read you input there is nothing that declarable about wis out of the picture you are just trolling. |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
645
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 23:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:Rhes wrote:Arduemont wrote:The number of people subbed has nothing to do with it. In a subscription game it's the only metric that matters. I don't know why people keep wanting to ignore it. If they scrapped their current plan and went all in on WiS and it caused most of the subscribers to stop giving CCP money would you count that as a success? You really didn't understand what I said. I am saying that as long as WiS would increase subs, it doesn't matter how good the game is doing at the moment. I agree, subs are the only thing that matters, but the current subs are irrelevant. It is only the potential subs gained over the current that matter. The fact that the game is doing fine does not mean it can not do better. That is what I am saying. When I said "The number of people subbed has nothing to do with it.", I meant it. Because The number of people who could be subbed, is more important an indicator in this argument.
This is all based on speculation there is no data that can be backing it up. Even if the login numbers is lower then "normal". perhaps some friends left for that particular reason but that will not say everyone is doing that for the same purpose.
The only thing we can do is wait. Speculation on some matter will not help even when you find the answer the damage is already done.
|

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
645
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 23:46:00 -
[8] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Arduemont wrote:I am saying that as long as WiS would increase subs, it doesn't matter how good the game is doing at the moment. I agree, subs are the only thing that matters, but the current subs are irrelevant. It is only the potential subs gained over the current that matter Your problem is asserting that WiS would increase subs when past history indicates, rather clearly, that it has the opposite effect. The only time in the history of Eve that subscription count went down was when WiS was released.
So far i know the subscription was going up even better than expected however after a small time the was dropping fast because of the "older subs leaving" because the are waiting what the want to get in that expansion however the get a broken Mechanic and more bugs even the WiS was release. So the blame WiS about the delay of the fixs the want to have.Taking them almost 2 years to do it right this is where the subscribes fails down. old members quit rage it about the new expansion. blaming WiS for the delay.. Sounds easy right? and thats was the case back then. Not that WiS is a failer.
The work so hard to make WiS good that the forgot about the core players. And that was a big mistake CCP knows that now the focus more in eve then in WiS but wis is not out yet so a small team was release to keep WiS a promise change while the rest focus more on bugs and small new things. And thats what we have now. |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
645
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 00:00:00 -
[9] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Arduemont wrote:The assertion that "WiS" cause Incarnageddon, is just rubbish. Not least of all because we never got "WiS". Based on the complete failure of DUST and the fact that WoD is still vaporware do you honestly believe CCP is capable of adding meaningful WiS to Eve? And even if, by some miracle, they were would it worth having them neglect spaceship content again to appease a small group of people who can't live without it?
about Dust however its doomed to die or some miracle need to be happening to keep that game alive. http://crossingzebras.com/2013/06/21/the-tragedy-of-dust-514/
But thats apart from WiS. |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
645
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 00:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Johan Civire wrote:Rhes wrote:Arduemont wrote:The assertion that "WiS" cause Incarnageddon, is just rubbish. Not least of all because we never got "WiS". Based on the complete failure of DUST and the fact that WoD is still vaporware do you honestly believe CCP is capable of adding meaningful WiS to Eve? And even if, by some miracle, they were would it worth having them neglect spaceship content again to appease a small group of people who can't live without it? about Dust however its doomed to die or some miracle need to be happening to keep that game alive. http://crossingzebras.com/2013/06/21/the-tragedy-of-dust-514/But thats apart from WiS. Not really. If CCP isn't able to create a compelling avatar based game why would you think they could add meaningful avatar based gameplay to Eve?
The avatar game play is not needing you will not do everything in eve? do you. If you do everything you will not do it when you don`t like it. See it like a small extra without changing the game play. You don`t want to play it fine. Its not needing.
The content the can make is perhaps just to make a interaction between other people only for now. Just for the lols. The rest is a option for open. |
|

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
646
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:10:00 -
[11] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Sir Jack Falstaff wrote:The problem, Rhes, with your plan of staying the course and avoiding innovation is that it works great until suddenly, it doesn't. You are correct: subs are the best measure of the company's health, although active users is a very important measure of engagement. You're correct, right now, CCP doesn't need to do anything innovative: subs are strong, engagement is strong. They don't need to do anything. This is the Microsoft 2007 strategy. Windows and Office reign supreme. Who is going to use a phone without a keyboard except a bunch of carebear fools, right?
Unwillingness to change is the recipe for disruptive innovation. The only way a competitor steals the space MMORPG crown from Eve is if Eve lets them. No one, no one, is suggesting that Eve move from its core competency, which is community driven spaceship flying. But Eve needs to improve in areas where it is weak: PvE and customization. That's exactly the weaknesses that avatar play addresses, and creates excitement about the game in the process.
You're suggesting putting the game on autopilot. We know what happens when you do that, and the real world is far less forgiving than Eve. If a disruptive competitor points Eve as it slow boats to a gate, CCP doesn't get to wake up in a new clone. I'm not asking for CCP to stop expanding Eve or put it on autopilot. What I hope they don't do is try to expand it in a way that they tried once before and it almost killed the game. The problem with space Barbie enthusiasts is they can't see any other way for Eve to expand other than WiS and that's just narrowminded.
Thats not.. Like i say that before the put 1 team in the WiS "avatar" thats what 10 man? The rest still focus the main eve part new ships balance here and there put some tweaks and so on. Thats like 3/4 of there people. So you think the avatar game play will remove spaceships because of a avatar walking to a other player is a game breaking technology in eve or what? its a interaction not a game changing. You don`t want to use you`re barbie fine no one will care |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
646
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:22:00 -
[12] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Johan Civire wrote:Thats not.. Like i say that before the put 1 team in the WiS "avatar" thats what 10 man? The rest still focus the main eve part new ships balance here and there put some tweaks and so on. Thats like 3/4 of there people. So you think the avatar game play will remove spaceships because of a avatar walking to a other player is a game breaking technology in eve or what? its a interaction not a game changing. You don`t want to use you`re barbie fine no one will care Any resource (whether it's money or manpower) they put into WiS is a resource that's not spent on real Eve gameplay.
Also not true because thats a different team and not part of the regular eve crew. So the hired to do WiS without losing any real ccp member. So the have 5/4 crew. So there is no worry`s about losing resource. The gain resource. And the best part is its not the team on Iceland but in japan a other ccp partner  |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
646
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 10:02:00 -
[13] - Quote
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:What it doesn't makes sense is that CCP is more willing to devaluate EVE than to let players buy the vanity items they alredy have developed & QA'ed and are ready to switch from "seed_0" to "seed_1". It's ludicrous. I've made my mind to give 50 euros to Chris Roberts if he adds "girly" avatar content to Star Citizen, but I can't even see why CCP is not willing to take my money for a bloody dress for my bloody avatar when that dress has been sitting on Singularity for no less than 29 months.These icelanders are crazy! 
Collectors edition or some part of promotion. You need to ask them why? |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
654
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 00:14:00 -
[14] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Arduemont wrote:The sheer volume of drivel that comes out of Rhes is frankly amazing.
All of your arguments have been covered time and time again throughout this thread. I remember now why I stopped posting before, because I got tired of repeating myself to people who will just throw the same discredited arguments up over and over again. I haven't seen a single person discredit anything I've posted. Can you find some links for me?
This a good reading articular go read it. Thats why we are all mad about that fiasco back then.
http://massively.joystiq.com/2011/06/26/eve-evolved-the-day-that-eve-online-died/ |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
654
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 00:44:00 -
[15] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Johan Civire wrote:Rhes wrote:Arduemont wrote:The sheer volume of drivel that comes out of Rhes is frankly amazing.
All of your arguments have been covered time and time again throughout this thread. I remember now why I stopped posting before, because I got tired of repeating myself to people who will just throw the same discredited arguments up over and over again. I haven't seen a single person discredit anything I've posted. Can you find some links for me? This a good reading articular go read it. Thats why we are all mad about that fiasco back then. http://massively.joystiq.com/2011/06/26/eve-evolved-the-day-that-eve-online-died/ however that will not say we hate the WIS project no we love it only do not force us with crap like what happens back then. You guys are so stuck to Incarnagate,it is almost embarrassing No one in this thread wants something forced onto anybody The only thing we want is the OPTION to open that door
he genius have you even read my post before this, that link thats why or sherlock "Rhes" is afraid for i just pointing his point out and clearly say this fiasco is over now. |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
654
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 00:58:00 -
[16] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote: hey mastermind why should i read a blog from 2011 ,too long ago
Lol clearly you do dont read any post before the last one. you just post random nonsense about the lasted post you see. |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
654
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 01:08:00 -
[17] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Johan Civire wrote:oldbutfeelingyoung wrote: hey mastermind why should i read a blog from 2011 ,too long ago
Lol clearly you do dont read any post before the last one. you just post random nonsense about the lasted post you see. You clearly did not read anything i posted on this thread and any in the other WIS threads ,did you?
You post that answer on my post not visa versa if you have nothing to say useful or ashamed to say sorry mis read it then please by all means stop comment. |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
662
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 23:26:00 -
[18] - Quote
kosswomen Mckay wrote:I have given up on CCP especially since seeing star citizen and testing the hanger module.
Eve it's current state is like DOS compared Star Citizen being Windows 3.1. It has the same functionality but no graphical output. You can not fly your ship, aim or anything and when the developers tried to move the game toward the original vision then a vocal minority kicked up a fuss so they scrapped it.
To keep people interested in an MMO it has to change and develop. These patches that CCP roll out every 6 months are hardly representative of the head count of staff they have working internationally. I wonder what everyone is actually doing.
Eve needs this prototype, Wisley and Eve VR yesterday.
Like DOS Eve might be around for a long time but I know how i would prefer to interact with my PC and it certainly is not DOS.
Stop listening to **** heads CCP. Be strong and keep to the original vision that included getting out of your ship.
+1 Eve needs this. |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
674
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 09:50:00 -
[19] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:5: it may/can/should be done as a separate game!Then what's the purpose of it? We're here because our capsuleers in EVE had to become real people, there's no point to have avatars if they can't take advantage of our skillpoints, ISK and assets in EVE. Also, All the woulda-coulda-shouldas / Layin' in the sun / Talkin' 'bout the things / They woulda-coulda-shoulda done... / But all those woulda-coulda-shouldas / All ran away and hid / From one little did. Personally I would be really annoyed if they developed walking in stations as a separate game, as it would mean that I would need 2 subscriptions to play the game I wanted to play. Which is precisely the reason why CCP will probably do it that way. Greed is good.
Lets hoop that will not be the future of eve online. |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
676
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 10:23:00 -
[20] - Quote
Thetabetalpha wrote:You guys think they are capable to deliver any avatar content? CCP is spreading their efforts and devs thin among so many projects (even Blizzard who is significantly richer has less stuff going on at the same time) that at this development rate not even next generation of capsuleers(in real life-assuming Eve even lasts this long) will get to try ambulation.
^ This explain where the problem is. |
|

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
677
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 11:24:00 -
[21] - Quote
Thetabetalpha wrote:raven666wings wrote:Thetabetalpha wrote:You guys think they are capable to deliver any avatar content?
We don't have to think or ImagineGäó. There is already avatar content even in the first module of the game (Hangar module). Back the game, download it and see for yourself. I was talking about CCP. Personally, I do not believe CCP is either capable or willing to deliver avatar content. They got projects all over the place, they reinvent all over the place. Just look at the "UI" in captains quarters. Character movement controls feel awkward. As far as eve is all about ships goes - how about that drone UI. So it took them 10 years to add that drag and drop function for it. Well, thanks a lot, now we'll have to wait another 10 to get an iteration and hopefully get actual drone UI?  Wake up people.. "Meaningful avatar gameplay" (SoonGäó)Gäó
I think that's correct the have just to many project the are working one. The update the game "with here and there stuff" if the just focus on 1 area of the game perhaps the can finish that and move on.. On the next project. No instead people are complaining about there is no "essential update" more ships bug fixs visual effects upgrades. And some new core updates or fixses. That's the problem. Every one want something differed in this game. And CCP is working also on everything to try to keep them happy. This is where all the problem is. If the lose this project. "example more ship" and bug fixs here and there. I don`t think people will like that. If the focus to hard on WiS the other people are complaining. Its always people "A" says this and people "B" says that. So CCP try to keep both of them happy. And here is the problem.... |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
677
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 21:54:00 -
[22] - Quote
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:Trii Seo wrote:Would they be the good kind of subscribers, or the "Casual no pvp exploration 2/3/74%"?
I mean deadweights that just sit in hisec, gorge up on ISK and then get scream on the forums when they get shot? If the game was composed solely out of them, it'd die quickly.
PvP is being in-development and changed constantly. "Rebalance" of ships tends to change their mechanics completely. Rubicon brings us interdiction-immune Interceptors, minisiege Marauders and new SoE ships - that's actually not bad.
There seem to be plans to change POSes and Sov mechanics later down the line, much like there are no announced plans for WiS. And good - I'm pretty sure CCP aims for stories built on emergent gameplay and content created by players as a way to market the game.
They don't want us to play a role in a world they built. They want us to build a world from dust they gave us. They want EVE to be a game where player empires rise, set ambitious goals, make impact on history. Where a player can make himself a part of said empire. Great conflicts erupt, over resources or personal animosity. Empires are destroyed in wars that involve thousands of players.
This sounds way more epic than "Solo casual exploration". And it is - likely even to a casual player, if he were to even take his first step. The fact that CCP itself is working to develop exactly that kind of epic emergent gameplay in a avatar-only game should give you a clue.  PvE can be epic if it suits to PvP goals (just not "me and my 50 l33t bullies asploded yur ship, hawhaw you n00b!" PvP). A wall can be built a brick at a time, in a casual friendly manner, without a need to bring 50 friends and spend the next 6 hours doing the ingame equivalent to watch paint dry. And laying a brick on a wall can be learned in the first 5 minutes of game, without a need to learn to survive to the l33t bullies who out-everything you. You just need the WILL to do it, to ADD more EVE to EVE rather than paint the microwave in a different color, take the same old porridge and reheat it again. But CCP lacks the will. They're too old, or scared, or incompetent, or whatever. They don't have the right stuff and even when they hire outside talent to ave their asses from themselves, they manage to turn a LARPer into a fan of "moar nullsec" rather than give her a chance to save EVE from the reheated porridge of "build ships-asplode ships". Quote:As for development - EVE is old. Very old. A hint of work being done is the recent implementation of DX11 capability into the engine. Trust me - working on a code that old, likely poorly documented, is hard. It's harder than writing it from scratch. You can't write it from scratch either, because there is something out there that bases on 3 lines of code here you consider redundant. You optimize it, you break it and it all falls to pieces. In case you didn't noticed, most of that work was done in 2010-2011 as they developed the Carbon workframe. Legacy code is less of an issue now than updated but extremely complex FiS mechanics. FAI, restat one ship and all other 500 types take a hit, good luck not breaking anything in the process. EVE's FiS ecosystem is extremely complex and further complexity will not make any favor to it, so you better expect the Halellujah Plan removing complexity, maybe scuttling the whole SOV system and replace with "NewSpace Holding Mechanic". FiS doing too many things in too many ways is an issue. But meanwhile, other potential ecosystems are untouched. Like, WiS.
And what about the new mantle-api update. The say that mantle is better without the bottleneck of directx or opengl. If ccp is using..... So far i know ccp is working with amd. Are the still parners or not.... Any one know that? |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
692
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 01:40:00 -
[23] - Quote
Soulpirate wrote:Sneak peak at summer expansion 2017, "Incarna 2.0"
- Added golden pod visibility to CQ! - Moved CQ balcony so players using CQ can see the other ships flying by in stations without leaning and almost falling off. - Moved station door button to left side of door. - Changed message on door lock to "Station atmosphere decotamination failed, attempting again." - Removed couch and added a recliner, couches are for more than one person. - Added a few new station enviroment sounds. - Changed the bedding so it looks like someone used it while you were out. "This one was too soft" - Adding run animation or speeding up walk proved too difficult, shortened walkway from CQ to balcony. - Removed ashtrays to comply with current Icelandic public smoking bylaws. - Added a toilet.
I dont know about you, but I can't wait for this expansion, sounds epic!
Even this is a troll post i need to admit i lmfao about it. |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
703
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 06:19:00 -
[24] - Quote
I love to see the new trailer. |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
808
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 03:11:00 -
[25] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:Jara Blackwind wrote:Quote:If Elite Dangerous is going to feature avatar content and all they've had is a measly 2million in funding then it makes me wonder, what the **** is ccp doing? Quote:CCP really need to start looking at their plan and adjust accordingly otherwise they are going to get overtaken by the competition. Apparently they think that the policy that "sees emergent gameplay where other companies see griefing" makes them immune to said competition. Well their famous five year plan for player built stargates certainly caters to this crowd of nullsec gamers that hate high sec while the rest of get shafted.
Five years only give them 10+ year.  |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
812
|
Posted - 2014.01.11 03:53:00 -
[26] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Nyancat Audeles wrote:This is the reason we can't have nice things.
Whiners that are afraid to try any new or interesting ideas. When the WiS fetishists have some new and interesting ideas we can talk.
Still trolling dude? You don`t quit it do you. O wait ignore nah this guy made my day lmfao when he post here again with his flag in his hand NO WIS NO WIS NO WIS project. |

Johan Civire
The Lyran Empire
815
|
Posted - 2014.01.23 06:03:00 -
[27] - Quote
Can we please keep it civil? thanks. This is a very good topic. I like to read everything not some random troll post here and there. And yes even this is a none topic issue answer. But some one needs to say it atleast i hope a dev remove those nonsense post so we can keep this clean and going back to track! |
|
|
|